摘要: 社会学存在着多元化理论的取代式发展与学科整体的理论解释力受限 的悖论,中西皆然。建设中国特色社会学必须寻求对这一悖论的化解之道。群学作 为中国古典社会学,在悠久的历史中形成了融通主义传统,继承和发扬这一优秀传 统,可以在社会学各种 “范式”的相处方式上,消除 “取代式”,实行 “融通式”。 学科发展的历史,确证了融通则盛、不融通则衰。中国学术的这一内在逻辑,可称 为 “社会学融通主义的历史逻辑”,其交叠性更新、传承性发展、会通性转化和共 生性崛起等特点对中国特色社会学建设具有启发意义。在以中国式现代化全面推进 中华民族伟大复兴的历史机遇下,社会学融通主义契合中国式现代化实践的需要, 可以大展其能。
Abstract: The discipline of sociology faces a paradoxical situation characterized by the replacement of diverse theoretical paradigms alongside limitations in the overall explanatory power of the discipline, a phenomenon observed both in the East and the West. The construction of sociology with Chinese characteristics necessitates seeking a solution to this paradox. Qunxue, as a form of classical Chinese sociology, has cultivated a tradition of syncretism throughout its long history. Inheriting and advancing this syncretic tradition can alter the dynamics of interaction between sociological “paradigms,” facilitating their integration and amalgamation in a “syncretic” mode as opposed to their substitution and displacement in a “substitutionary” mode. The histories of academic disciplines have shown that syncretism leads to prosperity, and antisyncretism leads to decline. “The historical logic of syncretism in sociology,” as the internal logic of Chinese scholarship, is characterized by overlapping renewal, inheriting development, converging transformation and conjoining advancement, and serves as the inspiration for the development of sociology with Chinese characteristics. Syncretism in Chinese sociology aligns with the requirements of the Chinese path to modernization, and can aptly demonstrate its capabilities within the context of the historical opportunity presented by the comprehensive promotion of this path and the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
[V1] | 2024-06-19 09:37:54 | PSSXiv:202406.00368V1 | 下载全文 |
1. 场域理论下监狱“科室”民警和“监区”民警的职场冲突与调适 | 2025-04-24 |
2. 低生育率背景下培育我国新型婚育文化路径研究一一以黑龙江省为例 | 2025-04-24 |
3. “饭圈”乱象对青年价值观的影响及对策 | 2025-04-24 |
4. 中国2000-2020年出生性别比变动规律及其政策启示 | 2025-04-24 |
5. 乡村文化何以振兴? ——以“双轨”治理为视角 | 2025-04-24 |