An Analysis to Jameson’s Non-Political Representation of Capital
摘要: 詹姆逊对《资本论》的非政治再现只是后现代“认知测绘”的一个基本操作。通过对《资本论》第一卷的微观考察,詹姆逊认为马克思没有阐述政治与革命的问题,或者马克思把其间隐含或突然出现的政治与革命观点被对立统一的严谨论证表达方式自我否定了,而其中最有政治革命性的历史预言则是一次“更重要的断裂”。通过对《资本论》第一卷中的时间、空间与辩证法三个维度的专门透视,詹姆逊确认其中没有政治革命性的内容,总结得出《资本论》第一卷没有政治结论的政治结论。詹姆逊对《资本论》的非政治再现,意在告别宏大社会政治革命理论,是对马克思主义非整体性的理解,也是其对马克思主义理想信仰幻灭,走向后现代微观政治文化批判的生存策略的再现。
Abstract: Jameson’s non-political representation to Capital is only a basic operation of postmodern “cognitive mapping”.Through the microscopic investigation of Volume I of Capital,he believes that Marx does not elaborate on the problem of politics and revolution, or Marx denies the implicit or sudden political and revolutionary views by the rigorous demonstration and expression of the unity of opposites,and the most politically revolutionary historical prediction is a “more important fracture”.Through the special perspective of the three dimensions of time, space and dialectics in Volume I of Capital,Jameson confirms that there is no political revolutionary content, and concludes that there is no political conclusion in Volume I of capital.Jameson’s non political reappearance of capital is intended to bid farewell to the grand social and political revolution theory.It is not only the understanding of the non integrity of Marxism, but also the reappearance of his survival strategy of disillusionment with Marxist ideals and beliefs and moving towards postmodern micro political and cultural criticism.
[V1] | 2024-10-17 20:23:43 | PSSXiv:202410.01686V1 | 下载全文 |
1. 信息哲学研究的四条进路 | 2025-04-24 |
2. 艺术与审美的离合及本体重构 ——兼论艺术泛化时代的定义可能 | 2025-04-25 |
3. 绝对自然与适度生存 | 2025-04-22 |
4. 如何理解现代个体的人权——再思哈贝马斯的双重批判与主体间性重构 | 2025-04-22 |
5. “无用共通体”:南希对共同体的“政治式回撤”及其理论效应 | 2025-04-22 |