文化的生死问题探源

• 作者： 韩东屏 ¹
• 作者单位：
  1.  华中科技大学
• 发布时间：2025-03-27

摘要: 【摘要】文化的生死作为既成事实，只能是指群体文化的生死。学术界专门研究过文化生死的学者，有斯宾格勒和汤因比。但这二人无论是对文化之生死的指认，还是对文化生死之因的解释，都存在谬误，不能成立。文化作为人类创造力的果实，从生物性意义的现代人类算起，其生即起点是晚期智人的原始群文化，其后相继演变为氏族文化和国家文化，而其死即终点则是文化的主人不复存在之时。其生的成因是人为了满足自身需求所进行的创造，死的原因是群体文化的创造者和使用者被外部力量消灭或打散。

Abstract: Abstract: As a fait accompli, the life and death of culture can only refer to the life and death of group culture. Spengler and Toynbee are scholars who specialize in the study of cultural life and death. However, whether they identify the life and death of culture or explain the cause of life and death of culture, there are fallacies that can not be established. Culture, as the fruit of human creativity, from the biological significance of modern human beings, its birth is the starting point of the primitive group culture of late Homo sapiens, and then it has evolved into clan culture and national culture, while its death is the end point when the master of culture no longer exists. The cause of its birth is the creation of human beings to meet their own needs, and the cause of its death is that the creators and users of group culture are eliminated or scattered by external forces.

• 来自： 韩东屏
• 分类： 哲学 >> 马克思主义哲学
• 稿件状态： 已在期刊出版
期刊名称： 《《河北学刊》》 2025年年 第1卷 第1期
• 引用： PSSXiv:202503.03469 (或此版本 PSSXiv:202503.03469V1)
  DOI:10.12451/202503.03469
  CSTR:32012.36.PSSXiv.202503.03469
• 推荐引用方式： 韩东屏.文化的生死问题探源.《河北学刊》,2025年(1).[PSSXiv:202503.03469V1] (点此复制)