Research on the Academic Impact of Funded Papers: A Case Study in the Field of Biology
摘要: [目的/意义]探究有基金资助的论文是否会产生更大的学术影响力,旨在通过对样本数据的深入探析以达到优化我国基金分配策略的目的。[方法/过程]以WOS数据库中2003年-2012年发表在生物学领域期刊中的论文数据作为分析对象,对论文被引频次与是否有基金资助以及基金层面相关特征进行了相关性分析和回归分析。[结果/结论]结果显示有基金资助的论文在学术影响力上有明显的优势,基金资助机构数量对论文的学术影响力同样有着显著正向作用,以及处于发达国家的研究者发表的带有基金支持的论文具有更明显的学术影响力。
Abstract: This study aims to investigate whether funded papers exhibit greater academic impact and seeks to optimize the allocation strategies of funds in China through in-depth analysis of sample data. [Method/Procedure] The analysis is based on paper data published in biology journals in the Web of Science (WOS) database from 2003 to 2012. Correlation and regression analyses were conducted on citation frequency, funding status, and related characteristics of funding. [Result/Conclusion] The results indicate a clear advantage in citation frequency for funded papers. The number of funding agencies also has a significant positive impact on citations, and papers supported by funding from developed countries’ institutions demonstrate a more pronounced citation advantage.
[V1] | 2024-09-24 11:58:15 | PSSXiv:202409.01924V1 | 下载全文 |
1. 生产者责任延伸制下考虑平台绿色监管的回收决策研究 | 2025-04-25 |
2. 数字化转型背景下劳动关系重构的路径与挑战 | 2025-04-24 |
3. 面向复杂工程问题的CAD/CAM综合实践教学设计与实践 | 2025-04-25 |
4. 换电站建设补贴对新能源汽车换电模式的影响——基于供应链决策视角 | 2025-04-25 |
5. 新质生产力背景下物流企业绿色创新的三方演化博弈及仿真分析 | 2025-04-25 |