现代化“陷阱”与中国式现代化对“陷阱”的超越

• 作者： 孙泽生 ¹ 赵加华 ² 赵红 ³
• 作者单位：
  1.  上海师范大学
• 发布时间：2024-11-29

摘要: 一国现代化进程中往往面临着发展长期停滞的现代化“陷阱”，需从逻辑和理论上阐明其内涵、生成机理和内源与外源因素交互作用的规律。已有的主要现代化“陷阱”范畴和话语体系仅是现代化过程中面临风险挑战的经验观察和片段性刻画，将现代化“陷阱”与经济发展阶段、特定政府政策及国际政治现象结合起来阐释具有明显误导性。按照实现现代化所需的资源、要素与市场获得方式区分现代化路径，剥夺式和依附式现代化国家依赖已有剥夺格局支撑其居于社会化大生产前沿，但剥夺格局裂解而形成的外源式现代化“陷阱”是剥夺式现代化路径不可持续性的重要表征，也是后发国家自主式现代化推进的必然结果，依附式现代化国家既受益于剥夺格局，更面临剥夺格局裂解导致的双重叠加“陷阱”。内源式现代化“陷阱”来源于企业家注意力与诸要素适配的单世代效率与跨世代非效率间的矛盾，要超越内源式现代化“陷阱”，需在产权形态和生产组织上兼容单世代效率与跨世代效率。规避现代化“陷阱”的时代需求要从全球南方国家共同努力和人类命运共同体建构中得到充分满足，中国式现代化道路探索给出了超越现代化“陷阱”的可行路径及微观基础，可弥合人的逻辑与资本逻辑的分裂，持续实现生产效率与收入分配的高度统一。

Abstract: The modernization process of a country usually faces modernization trap with long-term stagnation in development, which calls for a logical and theoretical explanation for its connotations, mechanism, and interaction between endogenous and exogenous factors. Those previously-discussed modernization traps are only from empirical observations and fragmentary portrayals for the risks and challenges faced in the process of modernization, which is obviously misleading when combining modernization traps with the stage of economic development, government policies and international political phenomena. In this paper, different modernization path is distinguished based on the way for the resources, factors, and market access to achieve modernization. The deprivation-type and dependency-type modernization countries rely on existing patterns of deprivation to support their position at the forefront of socialized mass production. The exogenous modernization trap, resulting from the disintegration of deprivation pattern, is an important symbol of the unsustainability of the depriving modernization path, and is also an inevitable consequence of the autonomous modernization of developing countries. The dependency-type modernization countries not only benefit from the deprivation pattern, but also face the double superposition trap caused by the cracking of deprivation pattern. The endogenous modernization trap stems from the contradiction between the single-generation efficiency and the cross-generation inefficiency when matching the entrepreneurial attention and other factors. To pave beyond the endogenous modernization trap, it is necessary to make the property right form and production organization compatible with single-generation efficiency and cross-generation efficiency. The need to avoid the modernization trap could be fully satisfied from the joint efforts of developing countries, and the construction of a community with a shared future for mankind. The exploration of the Chinese-style modernization provides a feasible path and micro-foundation to pave beyond the modernization trap, which can bridge the division between human logic and capital logic, and sustainably realizing a high degree of unity between productivity and income distribution.

• 来自： 孙泽生
• 分类： 理论经济学 >> 西方经济学
• 稿件状态： 已投稿主题征文
征文主题： 平台智声|联合征文：学习党的二十届三中全会精神主题征文（截止2024年12月）
• 引用： PSSXiv:202411.02278 (或此版本 PSSXiv:202411.02278V1)
  DOI:10.12451/202411.02278
  CSTR:32012.36.PSSXiv.202411.02278
• 推荐引用方式： 孙泽生,赵加华,赵红.现代化“陷阱”与中国式现代化对“陷阱”的超越.哲学社会科学预印本平台:https://zsyyb.cn/abs/202411.02278.[PSSXiv:202411.02278V1] (点此复制)