中日气候变化民事诉讼途径及侵权责任构成的比较研究

• 作者： 张天杨 ¹
• 作者单位：
  1.  中国政法大学
• 发布时间：2025-01-09

摘要: 气候变化诉讼作为推动国家减碳排放政策的重要方式之一，近年来开始在中国与日本出现。中日两国的气候变化民事诉讼路径有所不同，但都围绕起诉主体的适格性进行讨论，特别是对于被告适格性的认定门槛应有所降低；而关于此类诉讼所涉及被侵害客体，呈现直接损害与间接损害两类形式，本文涉及的两国诉讼分别从人格权与社会公共利益两个角度，探索直接损害是否存在。在责任构成中，面对损害重大风险的不确定、被侵害权益保护边界的模糊以及因果关系的举证困难等问题，应该重视违法性与其他衡量要素的独立性、以及从重构因果关系的认定方式与理解方式方面进行应对。

Abstract: Climate change litigation, as one of the important ways to promote national carbon emission reduction policies, has begun to appear in China and Japan in recent years. The paths of civil litigation on climate change in the two countries are different, but they both focus on the eligibility of the subject of litigation, especially the threshold for determining the eligibility of the defendant should be lowered. As for the infringed object involved in such litigation, there are two forms of direct damage and indirect damage.The litigation of the two countries explores whether direct damage exists from two angles of personality right and social public interest respectively. In the constitution of liability, faced with the uncertainty of the major risk of damage, the ambiguity of the protection boundary of the infringed interests, and the difficulty of proving causality, we should pay attention to the independence of unlawfulness and other measurement elements, and deal with it from the aspects of reconstructing the way of identification and understanding of causality.

• 来自： 张天杨
• 分类： 法学 >> 环境与资源保护法学
• 说明： 偏向于司法实践与判例研究
• 稿件状态： 未投稿
• 引用： PSSXiv:202501.01246 (或此版本 PSSXiv:202501.01246V1)
  DOI:10.12451/202501.01246
  CSTR:32012.36.PSSXiv.202501.01246
• 推荐引用方式： 张天杨.中日气候变化民事诉讼途径及侵权责任构成的比较研究.哲学社会科学预印本平台:https://zsyyb.cn/abs/202501.01246.[PSSXiv:202501.01246V1] (点此复制)