您当前的位置:首页 > 论文详情

“公共空间”还是“鲁迅翁之笛”?——1933年《申报·自由谈》上的《庄子》《文选》之争新论

“Public Sphere” or “Lu Xun’s Followers”: A New Discussion on the Controversy of Zhuangzi and Selected Literature in the 1933 Shen Bao Freedom Talk

摘要: 1933年发生于上海报界的《庄子》与《文选》之争,虽广受关注,但论者集中于施蛰存与鲁迅对于传统的认知差别,却舍近求远。实则,鲁迅起初对“复古”的讽刺仅是老调重弹,但“小题大做”招致施蛰存揶揄后,二人笔战渐由学理讨论升级至个人恩怨。为不致落于下风,鲁迅运用策略将本无此意的施蛰存代换为“旧文学”“旧道德”的代表。在《申报·自由谈》编者的“倾向”下,新加入的作家们针对此“欲加之罪”大肆批评施氏,共同造成了对施蛰存的“围攻”。此个案提示着此前对近代报刊中“公共空间”的理解仍有反思空间。

Abstract: The controversy of Zhuangzi and Selected Literature, which took place in Shanghai newspaper in 1933, garnered significant notice. However, scholars’ focus on the difference between Shi Zhecun and Lu Xun on their understanding of tradition constitutes a misinterpretation. In fact, Lu Xun's original irony of "retro" was merely a recitation of an old tune, but after "making a fuss" caused Shi Zhecun to tease, the two people's pen battle progressively turned from scholarly debate to personal animosity. To avoid falling behind, Lu Xun used a strategy to replace Shi Zhecun with the representative of "old literature" and "old morality". Under the biased influence of the editors of Shen Bao Free Talk, the newly joined writers criticized Shi for the "wanting to commit crimes", which eventually turned into a "siege" of Shi Zhecun. This case implies that the previous view of "Public Sphere" in Modern China’s newspapers still need reconsideration.

版本历史

[V1] 2025-02-08 09:13:20 PSSXiv:202502.00145V1 下载全文
点击下载全文
在线阅读
许可声明
metrics指标
  •  点击量35
  •  下载量8
  • 评论量 0
评论
分享
邀请专家评阅
收藏