“公共空间”还是“鲁迅翁之笛”？——1933年《申报·自由谈》上的《庄子》《文选》之争新论

• 作者： 甄皓涵 ¹
• 作者单位：
  1.  高等教育出版社-《中国高等学校学术文摘》编辑部
• 发布时间：2025-02-08

摘要: 1933年发生于上海报界的《庄子》与《文选》之争，虽广受关注，但论者集中于施蛰存与鲁迅对于传统的认知差别，却舍近求远。实则，鲁迅起初对“复古”的讽刺仅是老调重弹，但“小题大做”招致施蛰存揶揄后，二人笔战渐由学理讨论升级至个人恩怨。为不致落于下风，鲁迅运用策略将本无此意的施蛰存代换为“旧文学”“旧道德”的代表。在《申报·自由谈》编者的“倾向”下，新加入的作家们针对此“欲加之罪”大肆批评施氏，共同造成了对施蛰存的“围攻”。此个案提示着此前对近代报刊中“公共空间”的理解仍有反思空间。

Abstract: The controversy of Zhuangzi and Selected Literature, which took place in Shanghai newspaper in 1933, garnered significant notice. However, scholars’ focus on the difference between Shi Zhecun and Lu Xun on their understanding of tradition constitutes a misinterpretation. In fact, Lu Xun's original irony of "retro" was merely a recitation of an old tune, but after "making a fuss" caused Shi Zhecun to tease, the two people's pen battle progressively turned from scholarly debate to personal animosity. To avoid falling behind, Lu Xun used a strategy to replace Shi Zhecun with the representative of "old literature" and "old morality". Under the biased influence of the editors of Shen Bao Free Talk, the newly joined writers criticized Shi for the "wanting to commit crimes", which eventually turned into a "siege" of Shi Zhecun. This case implies that the previous view of "Public Sphere" in Modern China’s newspapers still need reconsideration.

• 来自： 甄皓涵
• 分类： 新闻传播学
• 稿件状态： 已投稿期刊
• 引用： PSSXiv:202502.00145 (或此版本 PSSXiv:202502.00145V1)
  DOI:10.12451/202502.00145
  CSTR:32012.36.PSSXiv.202502.00145
• 推荐引用方式： 甄皓涵.“公共空间”还是“鲁迅翁之笛”？——1933年《申报·自由谈》上的《庄子》《文选》之争新论.哲学社会科学预印本平台:https://zsyyb.cn/abs/202502.00145.[PSSXiv:202502.00145V1] (点此复制)