生产价格只是“规范性的建构”吗？——论二阶堂对马克思学说的诘难

• 作者： 王庚 ¹
• 作者单位：
  1.  南京审计大学-经济学院
• 发布时间：2025-03-14

摘要: 日本学者二阶堂基于对资本逐利行为的动力学分析否定利润平均化趋势的研究在西方影响广泛，但并未获得国内学者的关注。本文首先批判地回顾了二阶堂的理论模型，进而紧扣《资本论》及其手稿中的有关论述，建立了一个在微观机制上有别于二阶堂的资本流动和利润率演化模型，在此基础上通过仿真模拟展示了利润平均化过程的典型样式及其普遍性。本文研究不仅直截了当地驳斥了二阶堂对马克思平均利润和生产价格理论所持的否定意见，模型所涉及的微观分析对于重新认识“转形问题”也具有一定的启发意义。

Abstract: Japanese scholar Nikaido's research, which denies the general trend of profit equalization based on a dynamic analysis of capital's pursuit of profit, has had a widespread impact in the West but has not received attention from domestic scholars. This paper first critically reviews Nikaido's theoretical model and then, focusing on the relevant discussions in Capital and its manuscripts, establishes a capital flow and profit rate evolution model that differs from Nikaido's in terms of micro-mechanisms. On this basis, through simulation, the paper demonstrates the typical patterns and universality of the process of profit equalization. The research not only directly refutes Nikaido's negative views on Marx's theory of average profit and production prices, but the micro-analysis involved in the model also has certain enlightening implications for re-understanding the "transformation problem".

• 来自： 王庚
• 分类： 理论经济学 >> 政治经济学
• 稿件状态： 已投稿期刊
• 引用： PSSXiv:202503.01154 (或此版本 PSSXiv:202503.01154V1)
  DOI:10.12451/202503.01154
  CSTR:32012.36.PSSXiv.202503.01154
• 推荐引用方式： 王庚.生产价格只是“规范性的建构”吗？——论二阶堂对马克思学说的诘难.哲学社会科学预印本平台:https://zsyyb.cn/abs/202503.01154.[PSSXiv:202503.01154V1] (点此复制)