恢复性司法理念下污染环境罪共同犯罪量刑的困境检视与纾解路径

• 作者： 杨程硕 ¹ 张立波 ¹
• 作者单位：
  1.  北京市丰台区人民法院
• 通讯作者： 杨程硕 
• 发布时间：2025-04-22

摘要: 污染环境罪共同犯罪案件呈现出明显的类型化特征，根据行为方式可划分为排放型、倾倒型、 处置型以及混合型四类典型样态。基于实证分析并结合涵摄推论的分析框架可发现，污染环境罪共同犯罪 量刑的现实困境主要集中于规范识别失焦、规范解释失范、责任判定失衡以及事实认定失据四个维度。恢 复性司法理念通过兼具外部理性支撑与内部价值指引的双重证成功能，为破解量刑困境提供疏解方案。通 过建构“规范识别—解释规则—责任判定”的三阶纾解路径，实现“规范体系的结构化识别”“ 恢复性司法 理念指引下的系统性规则构建”以及“违法行为要素与责任类型的实质化匹配”，最终达成实质理性与形式 理性并重的妥当裁判效果。

Abstract: The joint crime cases of environmental pollution crime show obvious typological characteristics, which can be divided into four typical types: emission type, dumping type, disposal type and mixed type according to the behavior mode. Based on the empirical analysis and the analysis framework of the inductive inference, it can be found that the practical dilemma of the sentencing of the joint crime of environmental pollution crime is mainly focused on the four dimensions of the loss of focus of normative identification, the loss of normative interpretation, the imbalance of responsibility determination and the loss of facts. The concept of restorative justice provides a solution to the dilemma of sentencing through the dual evidence of both external rational support and internal value guidance. By constructing a three-stage relief path of" normative identification-interpretation rules-responsibility determination," we can realize the "structured identification of normative system," "systematic rule construction under the guidance of restorative justice concept" and "substantive matching of illegal behavior elements and responsibility types" and finally achieve the proper judgment effect of both substantive rationality and formal rationality.

• 来自： 杨程硕
• 分类： 法学 >> 刑法学
• 稿件状态： 已被期刊评审中
• 引用： PSSXiv:202504.02528 (或此版本 PSSXiv:202504.02528V1)
  DOI:10.12451/202504.02528
  CSTR:32012.36.PSSXiv.202504.02528
• 推荐引用方式： 杨程硕,张立波.恢复性司法理念下污染环境罪共同犯罪量刑的困境检视与纾解路径.哲学社会科学预印本平台:https://zsyyb.cn/abs/202504.02528.[PSSXiv:202504.02528V1] (点此复制)