Dualistic Reconstruction of the Precedence of Administrative Reconsideration under the Threshold of Substantive Resolution of Administrative Disputes
摘要: “实质性化解行政争议”的理念应当在行政复议前置的制度运行过程中得到贯彻,主要体现为行政复议前置范围扩张的规范化和行政复议前置案件的定分止争。当前我国行政复议前置的相关法规范存在设定权限过度下放、部门主义倾向严重、内在体系紊乱等问题,因此应当限缩复议前置的设定权限,仅允许法律设定复议前置相关内容。具体而言,在程序法层面,由《行政复议法》设定行政复议前置的专业化解、程序便捷以及重大利益保留的实质性标准;在实体法层面,由其他单行法律作出复议前置情形的具体规定,发挥最高人民法院司法解释和典型案例的限制作用,适时修订、废止部分现存的复议前置规范条款,以防复议前置范围的无限扩张。
Abstract: The concept of substantive resolution of administrative disputes should be implemented in the operation of the system of administrative reconsideration precedence. This is mainly reflected in the standardisation of the expansion of the scope of administrative reconsideration and the settlement of disputes in administrative reconsideration cases. At present, China’s administrative reconsideration prior to the relevant laws and norms exists excessive decentralisation of setting authority, serious tendency of departmentalism, inherent system disorders and other problems. Therefore, the level of norms for the setting of administrative reconsideration should be limited, and only the law should be allowed to set the administrative reconsideration. Specifically, at the level of procedural law, there is a need for the Administrative Reconsideration Law to set substantive standards for professionalisation, procedural expediency and the retention of significant interests prior to administrative reconsideration. At the level of substantive law, specific provisions for administrative reconsideration situations are made in other separate laws. It should fulfil the limiting role of the Supreme People’s Court’s judicial interpretations and typical cases. The legislature should also amend
and repeal some of the existing administrative reconsideration normative provisions in due course to prevent the unlimited expansion of the scope of the reconsideration front.
[V1] | 2024-06-19 08:46:56 | PSSXiv:202406.00345V1 | 下载全文 |
1. 版权法视角下学术期刊增强出版的激励路径实现 | 2025-04-27 |
2. 气候变化诉讼的中国路径 | 2025-04-27 |
3. 中国气候变化诉讼的困境审视与完善路径——以“弃风弃光”案为切入点 | 2025-04-27 |
4. “双碳”目标下气候变化诉讼的法律进路 | 2025-04-27 |
5. 德法兼治下的促进型立法:何以产生与何以促进 | 2025-04-27 |