您当前的位置:首页 > 论文详情

迈向高质量发展的乡村全面振兴:水平测度、结构差异与空间效应

Comprehensive rural revitalization towards high-quality development: level measurement, structural differences and spatial effects

摘要: 科学评估中国乡村振兴高质量发展水平对于全面推进中国式农业农村现代化具有重要的理论价值和现实意义。本研究以新发展理念为指引,以乡村振兴二十字方针为导向,以人民对美好生活的需要为目的,从高效农业、绿色生态、教育为本、美好生活和基层治理五个维度构建中国乡村振兴高质量发展评价指标体系,采用Dagum基尼系数、动态偏离份额传统模型和空间模型对中国乡村振兴高质量发展进行实证分析。研究结果表明,中国乡村振兴高质量发展水平呈现稳步上升的趋势。分维度来看,美好生活维度发展水平最高,基层治理维度发展水平最低。Dagum基尼系数从0.24降至0.172,且绿色生态、教育为本和美好生活维度处于结构优势状态,对乡村振兴高质量发展起到正向推动作用。总体来看,区域间乡村振兴高质量发展差距在遂步缩小,但发展结构仍存在一定的差异性。进一步分析可知,东、西部地区高效农业和基层治理发展对中部地区产生负向空间溢出效应,这表明区域间乡村振兴高质量发展还不够充分,这种不充分性导致区域间乡村振兴高质量发展没有完全形成正向协同联动性,可能会进一步加剧乡村振兴高质量发展的不平衡。本研究认为实现乡村振兴高质量发展需要正视结构差异性问题,分类施策,通过制定合作机制,促进区域间乡村振兴实现高质量协同发展。

Abstract: Scientifically assessing the level of high-quality development of China’s rural revitalization is of great theoretical value and practical significance for comprehensively advancing the Chinese-style modernization of agriculture and rural areas. This study takes the new development concept as a guide, the 20-word guideline for rural revitalization as an orientation, and the people’s need for a better life as an objective, and constructs an evaluation index system for high-quality development of China’s rural revitalization in five dimensions, namely, high-efficiency agriculture, green ecology, education-based, good life and grass-roots governance. Dagum Gini coefficient, dynamic deviation share traditional model and spatial model are used to empirically analyze the high-quality development of rural revitalization in China. The results of the study show that the level of high-quality development of China’s rural revitalization has shown a steady upward trend. In terms of dimensions, the good living dimension has the highest level of development and grassroots governance has the lowest level of development. Dagum Gini coefficient decreased from 0.24 to 0.172, and the green ecology, education-based and good life dimensions are in a state of structural advantage, which positively contributes to the revitalization of the countryside and high-quality development. Overall, the interregional gap in high-quality development for rural revitalization is gradually narrowing, but there is still some variability in the structure of development. Further analysis shows that the development of efficient agriculture and grass-roots governance in the eastern and western regions has a negative spatial spillover effect on the central region, which indicates that the high-quality development of rural revitalization between regions is not yet sufficient. This insufficiency has led to the incomplete formation of positive synergies and linkages in the interregional high-quality development of rural revitalization, which may further exacerbate the imbalance in the high-quality development of rural revitalization. This study argues that the realization of high-quality development for rural revitalization requires facing up to the problem of structural variability, classifying and applying policies, and promoting interregional rural revitalization to achieve high-quality synergistic development through the development of cooperation mechanisms.

版本历史

[V1] 2025-03-21 14:10:06 PSSXiv:202503.01874V1 下载全文
点击下载全文
在线阅读
许可声明
metrics指标
  •  点击量68
  •  下载量17
  • 评论量 0
评论
分享
收藏