摘要: 历史是一场过去和现在之间的苍茫对话。人们从过去的历史中寻找知识,不仅仅是为了满足增长见识的需要,还要从中汲取经验教训,丰富现在的智慧。然而,不同政治势力往往也会通过历史书写来实现其不同的政治需要,这便使得历史事实变得模糊不清。古代中越关系史,其中宋丁关系就是一个典型的例子。近年来,学界对宋丁关系不甚关注,研究成果较有限,主要围绕宋丁关系的和平交往,代表中越两国在历史上的一段和谐关系展开。古代史籍的编纂经常使用编年记载的方式,史家更注重于记载事件,而非发现事件的本质。由于每位史臣对事件的认识程度不同,使得唯一的历史真实在诸多的史籍记载中变成了许多不一样的事件。因此,通过对中越史书的对照研究,可以看出关于北宋与大瞿越的关系,无论是在战争或是和平友好时期,中越史籍对同一个事件的记载都往往存在分歧。大多数专论局限于双方关系,缺乏考察其他来自南汉、南唐、辽朝等客观因素对宋丁关系的影响。这使得10世纪的中越关系比较简单呈现单线的进展。本文在中越史料对比视野下,以丁部领称帝、南汉及南唐与宋丁交往等现象为中心,复原这一段生动及多变的中越关系史。
Abstract: History is an ongoing dialogue between the past and the present. Human beings seek knowledge of the past not only to satisfy a desire for understanding but also to derive lessons and enrich contemporary wisdom. However, various political forces often manipulate historical narratives to serve their own interests, which can obscure the clarity of historical facts. The history of Sino-Vietnamese relations in antiquity serves as a prime example of this phenomenon. In recent years, the academic community has paid little attention to the Song-Dinh relationship, and research results are relatively limited, mainly focusing on the peaceful exchanges between the Song and Dinh relations, which represent a harmonious relationship between China and Vietnam in history. Historical records from the time of the Northern Song Dynasty reveal confusion in the documentation of relations between the Song Dynasty and Dai Co Viet. This confusion pertains to both the chronology and the names of key figures involved. Such discrepancies reflect deeper realities. On the one hand, the complexity of the relationship between the Northern Song and Dai Co Viet makes it difficult for historians from both countries to accurately capture the historical reality. On the other hand, ancient historical texts often relied on a chronological approach, focusing more on recording events than on uncovering the underlying significance or essence of those events. Most monographs are limited to the relationship between the two sides, lacking the influence of other objective factors such as the Southern Han, Southern Tang, and Liao Dynasty on the relationship between Song and Dinh. This makes the Sino-Vietnamese relationship in the 10th century relatively simple and presents a single-line development. In the perspective of the comparison of Chinese and Vietnamese historical materials, this article focuses on the phenomena such as Ding Buling's enthronement, the exchanges between the Southern Han and Southern Tang and the Song and Ding, and restores this vivid and changeable history of Sino-Vietnamese relations.
[V1] | 2025-04-21 14:22:03 | PSSXiv:202504.02430V1 | 下载全文 |
1. 福建师范大学社会历史学院+吴耀庭+印度尼西亚卫生外交研究的冷战视角:现状、意义及反思 | 2025-04-25 |
2. 山东根据地北海银行会计制度研究(1938一1948) | 2025-04-22 |
3. 略论民国时期会计师服务收费思想与实践 | 2025-04-22 |
4. 近代华资银行信息能力建设考略(1919一1937) | 2025-04-22 |
5. 理想与现实:近代中国在东北地区自有路港系统的竞争力 | 2025-04-22 |